Built on science, not guilt
Every feature in Resolved is grounded in decades of behavioral science and neuroscience research. We didn't invent these principles. We designed an app that makes them practical for daily life.
The Planning Problem
Why decisions made in the moment fail, and how to make them stick.
Hot-Cold Empathy Gap
1996–2005George Loewenstein et al.
“People in calm 'cold' states systematically underestimate how much visceral 'hot' factors (stress, fatigue, hunger, temptation) will influence their future behavior. This leads to overcommitment and subsequent failure.”
How Resolved applies this
Implementation Intentions Meta-Analysis
2006Peter Gollwitzer & Paschal Sheeran
“Forming implementation intentions increases the likelihood of goal attainment by an average effect size of d = .65 (medium-to-large), equivalent to doubling success rates in many domains. Works by heightening cue accessibility and automating initiation.”
How Resolved applies this
Strategic Automaticity
1997Peter Gollwitzer & Veronika Brandstätter
“Implementation intentions delegate the control of behavior to situational cues, thereby automating goal-directed responses. Success rates increase dramatically by offloading from deliberate control to automatic triggering.”
How Resolved applies this
Planning & Instant Habits
2014Peter Gollwitzer
“Implementation intentions create instant habits by linking critical situations to goal-directed responses, reducing the need for conscious deliberation in the moment of action.”
How Resolved applies this
The Resilience Problem
Why one miss spirals into total abandonment, and how to contain it.
Abstinence Violation Effect
1985G. Alan Marlatt & Judith Gordon
“A single lapse in rigid, all-or-nothing rule-following triggers the 'abstinence violation effect', a cognitive-emotional response where people attribute the slip to personal failure, leading to complete abandonment of the goal.”
How Resolved applies this
Fresh Start Effect
2014Hengchen Dai, Katherine Milkman & Jason Riis
“Temporal landmarks (new weeks, months, or self-defined periods) create psychological distance from past imperfections, allowing people to relegate failures to a 'previous self' and begin fresh with renewed motivation.”
How Resolved applies this
The Learning Problem
How the brain actually updates behavior, and why misses aren't failures.
Reward Prediction Error
1997–2010sWolfram Schultz et al.
“Dopamine neurons encode prediction errors: the difference between expected and actual outcomes. These mismatches serve as the brain's primary teaching signal, updating mental models to improve future predictions.”
How Resolved applies this
Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions
2010sGabriele Oettingen et al.
“Combining positive visualization with realistic obstacle identification, then forming if-then plans, improves both commitment calibration and follow-through. Optimism alone backfires; realistic planning succeeds.”
How Resolved applies this
The Capacity Problem
Why executive function and dopamine matter, and how to work with dysregulation.
Intertemporal Bargaining & Personal Rules
1975–2001George Ainslie
“Self-control is a negotiation between present and future selves. Credible, bright-line rules prevent slippery-slope rationalization because violating them once signals that future violations are acceptable, destroying the rule's power.”
How Resolved applies this
Bright Lines & Zero-Tolerance Rules
1990s–2010sGeorge Ainslie, Roy Baumeister et al.
“Bright lines are unambiguous boundaries that eliminate the need for in-the-moment judgment. Unlike flexible rules that require constant re-evaluation, bright lines are self-enforcing: crossing them is unmistakably a violation, making rationalization impossible.”
How Resolved applies this
Breakdown of Self-Control Strategies
2001George Ainslie
“Personal rules work by bundling sequences of temptations into single decisions; bright lines prevent bargaining, but rigid rules without flexibility lead to collapse on violation.”
How Resolved applies this
Anterior Mid-Cingulate Cortex Plasticity
2010s–2020sAndrew Huberman, Lisa Feldman Barrett et al.
“The anterior mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC) is associated with tenacity and the ability to persist through resistance. Crucially, this region shows plasticity: it can grow through repeated voluntary effort, building capacity for future challenges.”
How Resolved applies this
Tiny Habits & B=MAP Model
2019BJ Fogg
“Behavior occurs when Motivation, Ability, and Prompt converge simultaneously. Starting extremely small maximizes Ability, anchoring to existing routines provides reliable Prompts, and success builds Motivation for expansion.”
How Resolved applies this
Executive Functions in ADHD
1997–2011Russell A. Barkley
“ADHD is primarily a disorder of executive functions (self-regulation, working memory, and inhibition) rooted in prefrontal cortex deficits. Daily life requires constant self-directed actions that non-ADHD brains handle automatically.”
How Resolved applies this
Dopamine & Effort-Cost in ADHD
2009–2015Nora D. Volkow et al.
“ADHD is characterized by lower dopamine transporter availability and reduced baseline dopamine in prefrontal/reward circuits, making delayed rewards feel worthless and effort feel costly.”
How Resolved applies this
Dopamine & Effort-Based Decisions
2012Roshan Cools et al.
“Low dopamine states increase perceived effort cost: individuals avoid tasks despite wanting outcomes. Boosting dopamine (or reducing perceived cost) restores willingness to engage.”
How Resolved applies this
Reward Prediction Error in ADHD
2008–2010sTripp & Wickens (applying Schultz)
“Blunted reward prediction error signaling in ADHD reduces learning from positive outcomes and sensitivity to delayed rewards. The dopamine teaching signal is weaker, making behavior change slower.”
How Resolved applies this
The Trust Problem
Why self-trust compounds, and how kept promises build it.
Self-Signaling & Recursive Trust
2000sRoland Bénabou & Jean Tirole
“Actions signal traits not just to others but to oneself. Keeping commitments builds evidence that 'I am someone who follows through,' creating recursive self-trust. Breaking commitments, even privately, erodes this self-model.”
How Resolved applies this
The Attention Problem
How your brain decides what matters, and how to work with it.
The Triple Network Model
2011–2021Vinod Menon
“The brain operates through three core networks: Default Mode (mind-wandering), Central Executive (focused tasks), and Salience (detecting importance, switching between the other two). Aberrant salience network switching underlies attention/motivation deficits in ADHD and related conditions.”
How Resolved applies this
Salience Network & The Anterior Insula
2007–2020sWilliam Seeley, Vinod Menon et al.
“The anterior insula, a key hub of the Salience Network, integrates bodily signals with environmental cues to determine what's personally relevant. It generates the felt sense of 'this matters now', the subjective salience that drives action initiation.”
How Resolved applies this
Cue-Triggered Goal Pursuit
2000Henk Aarts & Ap Dijksterhuis
“Strong cue-goal associations automate behavior; salient, reliable cues recruit attention effortlessly via the salience network.”
How Resolved applies this
Anterior Insula & Task Switching in ADHD
2009–2015Katya Rubia et al.
“ADHD shows hypoactivation in anterior insula/salience network during task initiation and switching, leading to procrastination, inconsistent performance, and difficulty starting even wanted tasks.”
How Resolved applies this
Anterior Cingulate & Conflict Monitoring
1999–2010sMatthew Botvinick, Jonathan Cohen et al.
“The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), working with the Salience Network, monitors for conflicts between intentions and actions. When it detects a mismatch (you intended to do X but are doing Y) it signals the need for cognitive control and behavioral adjustment.”
How Resolved applies this
Interoception & Decision-Making
1990s–2010sAntonio Damasio, Bud Craig et al.
“Interoception (awareness of internal body states) profoundly shapes decision-making. The 'somatic marker hypothesis' suggests that gut feelings and bodily sensations guide choices, especially under uncertainty. Poor interoceptive awareness leads to poor self-regulation.”
How Resolved applies this
The synthesis
Traditional habit apps treat behavior change as a willpower problem: set ambitious goals, track streaks, feel bad when you fail, try harder. The research tells a different story.
Behavior change is a prediction problem. The question isn't “how do I force myself to do hard things?” It's “how do I accurately predict what I'll actually do, then gradually expand that frontier?”
Resolved is built on this insight. Plan when you're clear. Commit only to what feels genuinely achievable. Treat misses as calibration data. Protect your capacity instead of depleting it. Build trust through kept promises, not broken streaks.
This isn't about discipline. It's about designing systems that work with your brain instead of against it.